Common statistical and methodological errors in rejected manuscripts: the case of RBSO

Abstract

The Revista Brasileira de Saúde Ocupacional (RBSO) receives several manuscripts with studies involving quantitative methods in Occupational Safety and Health (OSH). However, many submissions present methodological and statistical errors that compromise their acceptance. Lack of clarity in results and inadequate use of statistical methods are recurring issues. Insufficient description of methodologies, poorly justified statistical analyses, and unwarranted extrapolation of results are also frequent. This editorial note discusses common errors observed in manuscripts rejected by RBSO, with the aim of improving the quality of publications in the OHS field.