New diagnostic and prognostic marker in endometrial cancer

13Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: In this study, we investigated the correlation between serum and urinary neopterin levels as well as the stage of the disease in women with endometrial cancer. Increased neopterin concentrations are reported in patients with activation of macrophages by interferon-F, which includes the following: viral infections, autoimmune disorders, allograft rejection, and various malignant tumors. In patients with several types of cancer, highneopterin concentrations in body fluids like serum/plasma, urine, ascites, and cerebrospinal fluid indicate the course of the disease, and it is associated with poor prognosis. In the light of foregoing, we aimed to investigate the role of neopterin as a prognostic biomarker in endometrial cancer. Materials and Methods: Serum neopterin concentrations were determined by enzymelinked immunosorbent assay and urinary neopterin by high-performance liquid chromatography in 41 patients with endometrial cancer (group 2) and 41 healthy women (group 1). Results: Increased urinary neopterin levels were observed in patients with endometrial cancer (P < 0.001), and the difference in the urinary neopterin levels between low and high stages of endometrial cancer was significant (P < 0.01; stage I-II vs stage III-IV, respectively). Serum neopterin levels did not show a significant difference in each group. Conclusions: This study suggests that urinary neopterin levels are relevant in evaluating the endometrial cancer stage and follow-up of the disease. As a result, using neopterin and cancer antigen 125 together would be useful in determining the prognosis of endometrial cancer and its posttreatment progression.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bostanci, E. I., Dikmen, A. U., Girgin, G., Gungor, T., Baydar, T., & Danisman, A. N. (2017). New diagnostic and prognostic marker in endometrial cancer. International Journal of Gynecological Cancer, 27(4), 754–758. https://doi.org/10.1097/IGC.0000000000000952

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free