Addition of platinum compounds to a new agent in patients with advanced non-smal-cell lung cancer: A literature based meta-analysis of randomised trials

98Citations
Citations of this article
24Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Single new agents reportedly produce promising response and survival effects, but platinum-based doublets remain the standard chemotherapy for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of platinum for advanced NSCLC by carrying out a meta-analysis of trials that compared platinum-based doublets with single new agent therapy alone. Methods: We carried out a literature search to identify trials, conducted between 1994 and 2003, comparing a doublet of platinum plus a new agent with a new agent alone in previously untreated patients with advanced NSCLC. Outcomes analysed were response, survival and toxicity. Results: Eight trials encompassing 2374 patients were identified. Platinum-based doublets produced an approximately two-fold higher overall (complete and partial) response rate than the new agent alone [odds ratio = 2.32; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.68-3.20]. Platinum-based doublet therapy was also associated with a 13% prolongation of survival (hazard ratio = 0.87; 95% CI = 0.80-0.94, P<0.001). Despite significant increases in the frequencies of various toxic effects in patients receiving platinum-based doublets, no significant difference in treatment-related mortality was observed. Conclusion: This is the first published meta-analysis demonstrating the importance of combining platinum with single new agents in the treatment of advanced NSCLC. © 2004 European Society for Medical Oncology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hotta, K., Matsuo, K., Ueoka, H., Kiura, K., Tabata, M., & Tanimoto, M. (2004). Addition of platinum compounds to a new agent in patients with advanced non-smal-cell lung cancer: A literature based meta-analysis of randomised trials. Annals of Oncology, 15(12), 1782–1789. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdh476

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free