Progression of student self-assessed learning outcomes in systemic PBL

44Citations
Citations of this article
258Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Problem- and project-based learning (PBL) has been seen as one of the pedagogical models to bridge the knowledge gab between education and work. This article reports a study of students’ preparedness from a systemic PBL university to enter work life. Theoretically, a conceptual understanding of a systemic PBL is presented including four elements: 1) knowledge and problem modes, 2) variation in problem and project approaches, 3) an interlinked full-scale curriculum, and 4) focus on PBL competences and employability skills. A longitudinal study for a national cohort of Danish engineering education students from the first-year programme until graduation and into their first job is presented. A comparison of a systemic PBL university with a reference group is presented. The findings show that students at the systemic PBL university compared to the reference universities report a higher level of preparedness in terms of generic and contextual competences but self-assess themselves as less prepared considering more domain-specific competences related to natural science.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kolmos, A., Holgaard, J. E., & Clausen, N. R. (2020). Progression of student self-assessed learning outcomes in systemic PBL. European Journal of Engineering Education, 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2020.1789070

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free