Shouting Down a Well: The Development of Authorial Identity in Thesis Writing

1Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Despite the growing recognition that the researcher’s voice can be discerned in research writing, a positivist and technocratic view of the issue continues to dominate the narrative. In particular, debate centres on whether or not researchers should attempt to be as invisible as possible in their research, particularly in qualitative research. However, can the researcher’s voice ever be genuinely excluded? In my own thesis journey, the discovery and expression of my own voice and personality as a researcher, and its impact on the final product, was a significant discovery that took much longer than I thought it would. This was ultimately one of the most valuable outcomes of the process. In this chapter, therefore, I argue that the researcher cannot be truly separated from their research. In light of this argument, I argue that, far from seeking to disappear from their own writing, researchers should seek to make their presence in the research not only more obvious but specifically explicit.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

White, P. C. (2019). Shouting Down a Well: The Development of Authorial Identity in Thesis Writing. In Wellbeing in Doctoral Education: Insights and Guidance from the Student Experience (pp. 177–188). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-9302-0_15

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free