Multi-level assessment to reach out to rural breast cancer survivors

9Citations
Citations of this article
36Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Rural breast cancer survivors experience gaps in post-treatment education and support. We report the development and delivery of Reach Out to Rural Breast Cancer Survivors Program. Community-based participatory research and multi-level assessment were used to (a) engage rural community leaders, survivors, and providers; (b) analyze and report results of discussion groups to understand survivorship concerns and preferences; (c) integrate discussion group findings to develop, tailor, and deliver Reach Out; and (d) evaluate Reach Out with regard to satisfaction and helpfulness. In total, 16 rural breast cancer survivors participated in discussion groups. Four major concerns were identified through content analysis: lost in transition, self-management in survivorship, preference for support, and cancer surveillance. Major concerns and survivor preferences were integrated into Reach Out. A 15-item evaluation survey was used to assess the acceptability and helpfulness of Reach Out. In all, 72 participants attended three Reach Out programs; 96% completed evaluations of acceptability and helpfulness. In all, 68 were breast cancer survivors (99%), 88.4% were interested in the information; 91% indicated that personal objectives were met. Content about maintaining health, lymphedema management, and sexuality were ranked as most helpful. Rural survivorship concerns were similar to non-rural survivors, the major difference being access to services. In conclusion, multi-level assessment and community engagement were keys to understand rural survivorship and to develop and deliver content that attended to rural breast cancer survivors’ preferences.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gisiger-Camata, S., Adams, N., Nolan, T. S., & Meneses, K. (2016). Multi-level assessment to reach out to rural breast cancer survivors. Women’s Health, 12(6), 513–522. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745505716678232

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free