“Nothing Can Replace Authentic Human Interaction”: EI/ECSE Professionals’ Perception of AI

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is becoming increasingly integrated into everyday life, helping to automate routine tasks and freeing up individuals to focus on more complex, creative, or interpersonal responsibilities. Yet, the use of AI presents unique concerns related to privacy and bias. While AI developments have become widespread in K–12 and higher education settings, far less is understood about their use in early intervention (EI) and early childhood special education (ECSE). To fill this gap in the literature, we conducted an exploratory multi-method study to examine how EI/ECSE professionals perceive and utilize AI in their practice. Results from 68 participants provided unique preliminary insights into the knowledge, use, attitudes, needs, benefits, and concerns of AI by EI/ECSE professionals. Our findings reveal a complex landscape of attitudes toward AI among EI/ECSE professionals, characterized by cautious optimism coupled with significant knowledge gaps and professional development needs. Limitations, implications for practice, and future research directions are discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Meadan, H., Alqunaysi, R., Jennings, S., Douglas, S. N., Reilly, A. M., & Xiong, J. (2026). “Nothing Can Replace Authentic Human Interaction”: EI/ECSE Professionals’ Perception of AI. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/02711214261435935

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free