ALTERNATE: Neoadjuvant endocrine treatment (NET) approaches for clinical stage II or III estrogen receptor-positive HER2-negative breast cancer (ER+ HER2- BC) in postmenopausal (PM) women: Alliance A011106.

Abstract

504Background: For PM patients (pts) with locally advanced ER+ HER2- BC, NET improves breast conservation surgery (BCS) rates, and modified preoperative endocrine prognostic index (mPEPI) 0, defined as pT1-2 pN0 Ki67< 2.7%, or pathologic complete response (pCR: no invasive disease in breast or lymph node) is associated with low risk of recurrence without adjuvant chemotherapy (CT). The ALTERNATE trial was initiated to assess if the endocrine-sensitive disease rate (ESDR: number of mPEPI 0 pts/number of eligible pts initiating NET) with fulvestrant (F) or F+anastrozole (A) is improved relative to A alone (reported here) and if the 5-year (yr) recurrence-free survival (RFS) rate for pts with mPEPI 0 on A alone without CT is ≥ 95% (awaits further follow-up). Methods: PM pts with clinical stage II/III ER+ HER2- BC were randomized 1:1:1 to 1 mg A po daily, 500 mg F IM every 4 week (wk)s after loading dose, or A+F for 6 months. Ki67 was tested centrally on biopsies acquired prior to NET, wk 4, wk 12 and at surgery. Pts with Ki67 >10% at wk 4 or 12 were recommended to go off protocol-directed ET and switch to CT. Pts with mPEPI 0 at surgery were recommended to continue assigned ET for 1.5 yrs followed by A for a total of 5 yrs ET (and not to receive CT). The primary endpoint of the neoadjuvant phase was ESDR. ESDR of each F arm was compared to that of the A alone arm. With 425 pts per arm, a one-tailed alpha = 0.025 chi-square test of two independent proportions has 84% power to detect an increase of ≥10% in ESDR for F or F+A compared to the A arm, assuming ESDR ≤30% in A. Results: 1362 pts (A 452; F 454; A+F 456) were enrolled Feb 2014 to Nov 2018. 63 pts were excluded (did not start NET). Of the remaining 1299 pts (A 434; F 431, A+F 434), 42% were cN1-3 and 73% were considered candidates for BCS. ESDR was 18.6% (95%CI: 15.1-22.7%) with A, 22.7% (95%CI: 18.9-27.0%) with F, and 20.5% (95%CI: 16.8-24.6%) with A+F. No significant difference in ESDR was found between A and F (p=0.15) or A and A+F (p=0.55). Among the 825 pts with wk 4 Ki67 < 10% who completed NET and surgery, ESDR and the BCS rate were 27.7% and 70.3% with A; 29.6% and 68.1% with F, and 26.8% and 69.9% with A+F, respectively. Conclusion: Neither F nor F+A significantly improved ESDR compared to A alone in PM pts with locally advanced ER+ HER2- BC. RFS data are awaited. Support: U10CA180821, U10CA180882, U24CA196171, https://acknowledgments.alliancefound.org ; NCI BIQSFP, BCRF, Genentech, AstraZeneca. Clinical trial information: NCT01953588 .