C1-C2 fusion: postoperative C2 nerve impingement—is it a problem?

  • Myers K
  • Lindley E
  • Burger E
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this comparison case study is to show a potential complication associated with atlantoaxial fusion, and the preoperative evaluation that could help to avoid it. BACKGROUND DATA: The use of lateral mass screw fixation in atlantoaxial fusion has provided surgeons the ability to create rigid fixation, with a high success rate of fusion. While the use of screws for fixation is relatively easy to adopt, the risk of causing neurological damage to the patient is ever present. Many major structures, such as the vertebral artery, carotid artery, and spinal cord, must all be considered during surgery. METHODS: A comparison of two patients who underwent the same procedure was reviewed-the first had no complications from surgery and the second underwent revision surgery because of the C1 screw impinging on the C1 nerve exiting the foramen. RESULTS: After removal of the C1 screw and converting to a cable technique, the patient made a full recovery and neurological function was restored. CONCLUSIONS: When considering C1-C2 lateral mass screw fixation for atlantoaxial fusion, the size of the foramen should be considered. If the foramen is significantly narrowed, alternate fixation should be selected.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Myers, K., Lindley, E., Burger, E., & Patel, V. (2012). C1-C2 fusion: postoperative C2 nerve impingement—is it a problem? Evidence-Based Spine-Care Journal, 3(01), 53–56. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0031-1298601

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free