A leadless pacemaker matched with a vasovagal syncope: how long can it last?

3Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Guidelines recommend that cardiac pacing should be considered in patients suffering from frequent vasovagal syncopal (VVS) episodes. Studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of leadless pacemakers (LP) in cardioinhibitory vasovagal populations specifically, rendering them a reasonable alternative to transvenous pacing in these patients. However, due to the paucity of data on extraction and the number of concomitant LPs that can be safely implanted, there are concerns regarding LPs’ battery longevity, especially in younger patients who may require decades of pacing therapy. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of the first 100 LPs implanted at a tertiary cardiac centre in the UK. Demographical data and device parameters at implant and follow-ups were obtained from the hospital's medical records. The battery life of the LPs in the VVS patients was compared to that of patients with other pacing indications. Results: Ninety patients were included in the analysis. 14 patients (15.6%) had VVS, and 76 patients (84.4%) had other indications for pacing. Mean ages were 34 ± 13 years and 62 ± 20 years for the VVS and the other group, respectively. The estimated total battery life was 15.22 ± 0.35 and 13.65 ± 2.97 years in the VVS and the other indications group respectively (p =.04). There were no complications in the VVS group. Conclusion: LPs provide a promising treatment for patients with vasovagal syncope with reassuring battery performance at the short/intermediate term. Further longer-term follow-up data are needed to identify the true battery potential in this patient cohort.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

ElRefai, M., Menexi, C., Abouelasaad, M., Nettey, D., & Roberts, P. R. (2022). A leadless pacemaker matched with a vasovagal syncope: how long can it last? PACE - Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 45(7), 874–884. https://doi.org/10.1111/pace.14546

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free