The relevance of the Eemian for the study of the Palaeolithic occupation of Europe

23Citations
Citations of this article
61Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The relevance of a study of the Eemian occupation of Europe lies largely in the discussion on the environmental tolerances of early humans and in the limits encountered during the reconstruction of Palaeolithic habitats. The traditional vision is reviewed; then follows a discussion of Gamble's studies (1986, 1987) in which he postulated an absence of human occupation in North-Western Europe during the Eemian. Gamble's explanatory models and the reactions to his work are presented. Finally, the relation is considered between the distribution pattern of sites, the former dispersal of early humans across the European landscape, and the implications of this evidence for hypotheses of environmental tolerances of Palaeolithic humans.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Speleers, B. (2000). The relevance of the Eemian for the study of the Palaeolithic occupation of Europe. Geologie En Mijnbouw/Netherlands Journal of Geosciences, 79(2–3), 283–291. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0016774600021764

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free