Implications for new physics from fine-tuning arguments 1. Application to SUSY and seesaw cases

82Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

We revisit the standard argument to estimate the scale of new physics (NP) beyond the SM, based on the sensitivity of the Higgs mass to quadratic divergences. Although this argument is arguably naive, the corresponding estimate, ΛSM ∼ 2 -3TeV, works reasonably well in most cases and should be considered a conservative bound, as it ignores other contributions to the Higgs mass which are potentially large. Besides, the possibility of an accidental Veltman-like cancellation does not raise significantly ΛSM. One can obtain more precise implications from fine-tuning arguments in specific examples of NP. Here we consider SUSY and right-handed (seesaw) neutrinos. SUSY is a typical example for which the previous general estimate is indeed conservative: the MSSM is fine-tuned a few %, even for soft masses of a few hundred GeV. In contrast, other SUSY scenarios, in particular those with low-scale SUSY breaking, can easily saturate the general bound on ASM. The seesaw mechanism requires large fine-tuning if MR ∼ 107 GeV, unless there is additional NP (SUSY being a favourite option). © SISSA/ISAS 2005.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Casas, J. A., Espinosa, J. R., & Hidalgo, I. (2004). Implications for new physics from fine-tuning arguments 1. Application to SUSY and seesaw cases. Journal of High Energy Physics, 8(11). https://doi.org/10.1088/1126-6708/2004/11/057

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free