Copy number variation in a hospital-based cohort of children with epilepsy

14Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the diagnostic yield of microarray analysis in a hospital-based cohort of children with seizures and to identify novel candidate genes and susceptibility loci for epilepsy. Methods: Of all children who presented with their first seizure in the University Medical Center Groningen (January 2000 through May 2013) (n = 1,368), we included 226 (17%) children who underwent microarray analysis before June 2014. All 226 children had a definite diagnosis of epilepsy. All their copy number variants (CNVs) on chromosomes 1–22 and X that contain protein-coding genes and have a prevalence of <1% in healthy controls were evaluated for their pathogenicity. Results: Children selected for microarray analysis more often had developmental problems (82% vs. 25%, p < 0.001), facial dysmorphisms (49% vs. 8%, p < 0.001), or behavioral problems (41% vs. 13%, p < 0.001) than children who were not selected. We found known clinically relevant CNVs for epilepsy in 24 of the 226 children (11%). Seventeen of these 24 children had been diagnosed with symptomatic focal epilepsy not otherwise specified (71%) and five with West syndrome (21%). Of these 24 children, many had developmental problems (100%), behavioral problems (54%) or facial dysmorphisms (46%). We further identified five novel CNVs comprising four potential candidate genes for epilepsy: MYT1L, UNC5D, SCN4B, and NRXN3. Significance: The 11% yield in our hospital-based cohort underscores the importance of microarray analysis in diagnostic evaluation of children with epilepsy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Vlaskamp, D. R. M., Callenbach, P. M. C., Rump, P., Giannini, L. A. A., Dijkhuizen, T., Brouwer, O. F., & van Ravenswaaij-Arts, C. M. A. (2017). Copy number variation in a hospital-based cohort of children with epilepsy. Epilepsia Open, 2(2), 244–254. https://doi.org/10.1002/epi4.12057

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free