Software Protection: Myth or Reality?

10Citations
Citations of this article
44Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Staggering amounts of commercial software are marketed to fulfill needs from the PC explosion. Unfortunately, such software is trivial to duplicate! From the vendors’ viewpoint a way to protect profit is needed. Typically, they have resorted to various schemes that attempt to inhibit the duplication process. Although protection of future profit is important, so is protection against current loss. Commercial and business related software must be adequately protected lest data be stolen or manipulated. However, more important than any of these classes is protection of government computer resources, especially classified and operational software and data. Loss of control in this realm could be detrimental to national security. This paper addresses current technologies employed in protection schemes: signatures (magnetic and physical) on floppy disks, Software Analysis Denial (SAD), Hardware Security Devices (HSD), and Technology Denial Concepts (TDC) are presented, with an emphasis on SAD. Advantages and disadvantages of these schemes will be clarified.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gosler, J. R. (1986). Software Protection: Myth or Reality? In Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) (Vol. 218 LNCS, pp. 140–157). Springer Verlag. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-39799-X_13

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free