Evaluating the effects of second-dose vaccine-delay policies in European countries: A simulation study based on data from Greece

4Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The results of a simulation-based evaluation of several policies for vaccine rollout are reported, particularly focusing on the effects of delaying the second dose of two-dose vaccines. In the presence of limited vaccine supply, the specific policy choice is a pressing issue for several countries worldwide, and the adopted course of action will affect the extension or easing of non-pharmaceutical interventions in the next months. We employ a suitably generalised, age-structure, stochastic SEIR (Susceptible ! Exposed ! Infectious ! Removed) epidemic model that can accommodate quantitative descriptions of the major effects resulting from distinct vaccination strategies. The different rates of social contacts among distinct age-groups (as well as some other model parameters) are informed by a recent survey conducted in Greece, but the conclusions are much more widely applicable. The results are summarised and evaluated in terms of the total number of deaths and infections as well as life years lost. The optimal strategy is found to be one based on fully vaccinating the elderly/at risk as quickly as possible, while extending the time-interval between the two vaccine doses to 12 weeks for all individuals below 75 years old, in agreement with epidemic theory which suggests targeting a combination of susceptibility and infectivity. This policy, which is similar to the approaches adopted in the UK and in Canada, is found to be effective in reducing deaths and life years lost in the period while vaccination is still being carried out.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Barmpounakis, P., Demiris, N., Kontoyiannis, I., Pavlakis, G. N., & Sypsa, V. (2022). Evaluating the effects of second-dose vaccine-delay policies in European countries: A simulation study based on data from Greece. PLoS ONE, 17(4 April). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0263977

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free