Conceptualizing the Street-Level Bureaucrat Construct

1Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Differences among street-level bureaucrats—across professions, institutional settings, regions, and countries—are largely overlooked in research. We propose conceptualizing the street-level bureaucrat construct as a general variable that varies across institutional settings, professions, cultures, times, and locations. We analyze variations in street-level bureaucrats along two main dimensions: discretion and frontline-ness. We also identify sub-dimensions of discretion and frontline-ness. Discretion sub-dimensions include goal ambiguity, performance accountability complexity, organizational rule structures, and professionalism. Frontline-ness varies in closeness to clients, contact frequency, and emotional and relational embeddedness with clients. This framework for conceptualizing street-level bureaucrats as a general variable is particularly useful for understanding variation across types, professions, states, and countries, providing a fertile basis for comparative research on street-level bureaucrats.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cheema, F. S., Lee, E., Gupta, R., & Perry, J. L. (2026). Conceptualizing the Street-Level Bureaucrat Construct. Public Administration and Development. https://doi.org/10.1002/pad.70093

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free