Abstract
Recent workshops brought together several developers, educators and users of software packages extending popular languages for spatial data handling, with a primary focus on R, Python and Julia. Common challenges discussed included handling of spatial or spatio-temporal support, geodetic coordinates, in-memory vector data formats, data cubes, inter-package dependencies, packaging upstream libraries, differences in habits or conventions between the GIS and physical modeling communities, and statistical models. The following set of recommendations have been formulated: (i) considering software problems across data science language silos helps to understand and standardise analysis approaches, also outside the domain of formal standardisation bodies; (ii) whether attribute variables have block or point support, and whether they are spatially intensive or extensive has consequences for permitted operations, and hence for software implementing those; (iii) handling geometries on the sphere rather than on the flat plane requires modifications to the logic of simple features, (iv) managing communities and fostering diversity is a necessary, on-going effort, and (v) tools for cross-language development need more attention and support.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Pebesma, E., Fleischmann, M., Parry, J., Nowosad, J., Graser, A., Dunnington, D., … Abad, L. (2026). Spatial data science languages: commonalities and needs. Journal of Spatial Information Science. University of Maine. https://doi.org/10.5311/JOSIS.2025.31.462
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.