Spatial data science languages: commonalities and needs

1Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Recent workshops brought together several developers, educators and users of software packages extending popular languages for spatial data handling, with a primary focus on R, Python and Julia. Common challenges discussed included handling of spatial or spatio-temporal support, geodetic coordinates, in-memory vector data formats, data cubes, inter-package dependencies, packaging upstream libraries, differences in habits or conventions between the GIS and physical modeling communities, and statistical models. The following set of recommendations have been formulated: (i) considering software problems across data science language silos helps to understand and standardise analysis approaches, also outside the domain of formal standardisation bodies; (ii) whether attribute variables have block or point support, and whether they are spatially intensive or extensive has consequences for permitted operations, and hence for software implementing those; (iii) handling geometries on the sphere rather than on the flat plane requires modifications to the logic of simple features, (iv) managing communities and fostering diversity is a necessary, on-going effort, and (v) tools for cross-language development need more attention and support.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pebesma, E., Fleischmann, M., Parry, J., Nowosad, J., Graser, A., Dunnington, D., … Abad, L. (2026). Spatial data science languages: commonalities and needs. Journal of Spatial Information Science. University of Maine. https://doi.org/10.5311/JOSIS.2025.31.462

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free