Through an animal's eye: The implications of diverse sensory systems in scientific experimentation

16Citations
Citations of this article
21Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

'Accounting for the sensory abilities of animals is critical in experimental design.' No researcher would disagree with this statement, yet it is often the case that we inadvertently fall for anthropocentric biases and use ourselves as the reference point. This paper discusses the risks of adopting an anthropocentric view when working with non-human animals, and the unintended consequences this has on our experimental designs and results. To this aim, we provide general examples of anthropocentric bias from different fields of animal research, with a particular focus on animal cognition and behaviour, and lay out the potential consequences of adopting a human-based perspective. Knowledge of the sensory abilities, both in terms of similarities to humans and peculiarities of the investigated species, is crucial to ensure solid conclusions. A more careful consideration of the diverse sensory systems of animals would improve many scientific fields and enhance animal welfare in the laboratory.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Brebner, J. S., Loconsole, M., Hanley, D., & Vasas, V. (2024). Through an animal’s eye: The implications of diverse sensory systems in scientific experimentation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 291(2027). https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2024.0022

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free