Comparison of suction and beating tray sampling for apple pests and their natural enemies

  • Suckling D
  • Burnip G
  • Gibb A
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A beating tray and suction sampler were compared for their efficiency in sampling apple trees, and at determining the diversity of arthropods present in an apple orchard block managed for biological fruit production. Arthropods were identified to " recognisable taxonomic units " , and the Shannon-Wiener diversity index was calculated. The suction sampler consistently recovered significantly greater species diversity. Another experiment investigated the efficiency of the suction sampler, in relation to a subsequent destructive sample of foliage. The suction sampler collected ca. 60-70% of the taxa present on apple foliage under biological, integrated, or conventional fruit production. Suction sampling offered practical advantages but required greater laboratory input. Both methods could be used if their limitations are recognised, and require 10-15 samples for reasonable precision.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Suckling, D. M., Burnip, G. M., Gibb, A. R., Stavely, F. J. L., & Wratten, S. D. (1996). Comparison of suction and beating tray sampling for apple pests and their natural enemies. Proceedings of the New Zealand Plant Protection Conference, 49, 41–47. https://doi.org/10.30843/nzpp.1996.49.11422

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free