COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF MICROLEAKAGE IN ALKASITE AND GLASS-HYBRID RESTORATIVE SYSTEM: AN IN-VITRO

  • M.J B
  • C.K S
  • R S
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aim: To Compare and evaluate the microleakge of newly introduced Glass Hybrid restorative system(Equia Forte) with alkasite based restorative material(Cention N). Materials and Methods: 30 premolars free of caries or any other defects and extracted for orthodontic reasons were chosen for the study. Subsequently class I cavities were prepared and teeth were randomly assigned into two experimental groups (n = 15) and restored using EQUIA FORTE and CENTION N respectively. All the specimens were subjected to thermocycling. Specimens were stained with 0.6% RhodamineB dye and evaluated for dye penetration under stereomicroscope. Results: Equia Forte showed lesser leakage than compared to Cention N. Conclusion: The study therefore concluded that EQUIA FORTE to have lesser microleakage compared to CENTION N, thereby having better sealing ability.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

M.J, B., C.K, S., R, S., Sagar, S., Gowda R, A., & Guria, A. (2019). COMPARATIVE EVALUATION OF MICROLEAKAGE IN ALKASITE AND GLASS-HYBRID RESTORATIVE SYSTEM: AN IN-VITRO. International Journal of Research -GRANTHAALAYAH, 7(4), 199–205. https://doi.org/10.29121/granthaalayah.v7.i4.2019.891

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free