The US Endangered Species Act is legislation with the power to limit human activities that may have deleterious effects on the viability of threa- tened and endangered species of fauna and flo- ra. However, because most endangered species face multiple threats, it is often unclear whether limiting specific activities will improve the like- lihood of long-term survival, particularly when the relative importance of different stressors is uncertain. Wildlife managers responsible for pro- tecting these species face the challenge of de- termining the optimal allocation of limited funds and personnel among risk management and con- servation priorities, in the absence of a good un- derstanding of the relative importance of these stressors. We present an analytical framework that can serve as a technical basis for evaluating multiple risks to endangered species. Predictive and retrospective causal analysis applications are considered. The former address proposed pro- jects where the potential exists for adverse in- teraction between the project and an endanger- ed species. The latter involve existing projects or products for which a determination is being or has been made concerning the threats posed to an endangered species. The causal analysis me- thod described herein is a well-established pro- cedure that is widely used in other scientific fields and offers a practical and logical process through which threats to endangered species can be assessed and recovery actions prioritized.
CITATION STYLE
Salatas, J. H., Gard, N. W., Wickwire, T., & Menzie, C. A. (2013). Stressor analysis approaches for endangered species assessments. Natural Science, 05(05), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.4236/ns.2013.55a004
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.