Pressure drop: Securitising and de-securitising safeguarding

  • McKendrick D
  • Finch J
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: This article explores how securitisation theory is mobilised in contemporary social work discourse, policy and practice. We draw on recent child protection research to support our claim that a new practice issue, described previously as securitised safeguarding, has emerged.APPROACH: We demonstrate its emergence using securitisation theory as a conceptual mode of analysis to describe how a securitised safeguarding response depicts particular families as an existential threat which, in turn, prompts a response characterised by forms of muscular liberalism.CONCLUSIONS: We argue that this emerging practice issue requires critical consideration and suggest it will have a significant impact on social work – one that is unlikely to be beneficial for the profession and, more importantly, families being worked with. By describing a process of de-securitisation, we offer an alternative and more nuanced approach that perceives families holistically, and mobilises a welfare safeguarding model. This more closely resembles traditional social work values of emancipation, liberation and empowerment within social work practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

McKendrick, D., & Finch, J. (2020). Pressure drop: Securitising and de-securitising safeguarding. Aotearoa New Zealand Social Work, 32(1). https://doi.org/10.11157/anzswj-vol32iss1id706

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free