Community Protection versus Individual Healing: Two Traditions in Community Mental Health

6Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

This article identifies two major traditions that drive the mandate for a community mental health care system-community protection and individual healing. It discusses the historical antecedents of these two traditions and how these traditions relate to different visions of what the "common good" means. It then discusses how they both operate in the current US-based system, creating inherent conflicts and tensions, and gives specific examples from the personal and professional experiences of the authors. The article proposes ways to reduce the tension and discusses what sacrifices and compromises this resolution would entail for the US community mental health system. Copyright © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yanos, P. T., Knight, E. L., Vayshenker, B., Gonzales, L., & DeLuca, J. S. (2017). Community Protection versus Individual Healing: Two Traditions in Community Mental Health. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 35(4), 288–302. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.2297

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free