Is Demodex really non-pathogenic?

54Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Although usually considered a non-pathogenic parasite in parasitological textbooks, Demodex folliculorum has been implicated as a causative agent for some dermatological conditions, such as rosacea-like eruptions and some types of blepharitis. Several anecdotal reports have demonstrated unequivocal tissue damage directly related to the presence of the parasite. However, this seems to be exceedingly rare, in contrast with the marked prevalence of this infestation. We have had the opportunity to observe one of such cases. A 38-year-old woman presented with rosacea-like papular lesions in her right cheek. Histopathological examination revealed granulomatous dermal inflammation with a well-preserved mite phagocytized by a multinucleated giant cell. This finding may be taken as an evidence for the pathogenicity of the parasite, inasmuch as it does not explain how such a common parasite is able to produce such a rare disease.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pena, G. P., & Andrade Filho, J. D. S. (2000). Is Demodex really non-pathogenic? Revista Do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo, 42(3), 171–173. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0036-46652000000300012

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free