Rate and anchorage loss during en-masse retraction between friction and frictionless mechanics: A randomized clinical trial

3Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Objective: To compare rate and anchorage loss during en-masse retraction of anterior maxillary teeth between friction mechanics (FM) and frictionless mechanics (FLM). Setting and Sample Population: Thirty-eight patients requiring en-masse retraction of protruded anterior maxillary teeth were randomly allocated into FM and FLM groups. Methods: En-masse retraction with sliding mechanics (FM) using an elastomeric chain was compared with continuous mushroom loop archwire mechanics (FLM). Study models and lateral cephalograms were taken before (T1) and immediately after retraction (T2). The primary outcome was the rate of en-masse retraction. Anchorage loss was the secondary outcome. Intergroup comparison was performed using an independent t test (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sardana, R., Chugh, V. K., Bhatia, N. K., Shastri, D., Moungkhom, P., Kumar, P., … Singh, S. (2023). Rate and anchorage loss during en-masse retraction between friction and frictionless mechanics: A randomized clinical trial. Orthodontics and Craniofacial Research, 26(4), 598–607. https://doi.org/10.1111/ocr.12656

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free