Contingency in Philosophical Anthropological Knowledge

0Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The study of contingency within a philosophical-anthropological framework is increasingly relevant due to contemporary societal and scientific advancements, particularly in digital technology and artificial intelligence. This research examines the phenomenon of contingency as perceived and interpreted through philosophical-anthropological thought, focusing on its role and significance in human self-understanding and development. The study employs various research methods, including phenomenological, hermeneutic, and comparative analyses of philosophical traditions. Drawing on historical and contemporary works by Western and Eastern philosophers, such as J.P. Sartre, N. Kitarō, and Q. Meillassoux, the research explores how contingency relates to key concepts like subjectivity, identity, and the human relationship with time and space. The findings suggest that human identity and culture are not static but evolve through the influence of new knowledge and experiences, emphasizing the importance of flexibility and adaptability. Contingency, characterized by randomness and the absence of logical necessity, contrasts with determinism and necessity, highlighting the potential for continuous growth and transformation in personal and cultural contexts. Contingency can be defined as the necessity of realizing one of several possibilities. This underscores the need for a dynamic understanding of human self-realization and identity in the 21st century.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Medzhidova, N. H. (2025). Contingency in Philosophical Anthropological Knowledge. RUDN Journal of Philosophy, 29(2), 491–503. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2302-2025-29-2-491-503

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free