Abstract
Our goal in this study was to determine whether the urinary ratio of testosterone to luteinizing hormone (T/LH) as an indicator of exogenous anabolic steroid (AS) use is superior to the urinary ratio of testosterone to epitestosterone (T/E). After 2 weekly placebo injections, 19 subjects were given testosterone cypionate (TC) injections of 250 or 500 mg/week for 14 weeks followed by 14 weekly placebo injections. Patients were considered to have ceased taking TC if they tested negative 9 weeks after their last injection. For detection of illicit or supraphysiological TC (AS) use, the urinary T/E ratio of ≤6 yielded a false-negative rate of 46% and a false- positive rate of 4%. However, a urinary T/LH ratio of ≤30 produced a false- negative rate of only 24% and a false-positive rate of 13%. We conclude that the urinary T/LH ratio of ≤30 is a more sensitive marker of AS use than the urinary T/E ratio of ≤6 and remains sensitive for twice as long as urinary T/E.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Perry, P. J., MacIndoe, J. H., Yates, W. R., Scott, S. D., & Holman, T. L. (1997). Detection of anabolic steroid administration: Ratio of urinary testosterone to epitestosterone vs the ratio of urinary testosterone to luteinizing hormone. Clinical Chemistry, 43(5), 731–735. https://doi.org/10.1093/clinchem/43.5.731
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.