Types of urethral catheters for management of short-term voiding problems in hospitalized adults: a short version Cochrane Review

  • Schumm K
  • Lam T
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aims: This prospective, randomized, multicenter trial evaluated the 6-month success rate of sacral neuromodulation (SNM) with InterStim1 Therapy versus standard medical therapy (SMT) for overactive bladder (OAB). Methods: Enrolled subjects discontinued OABmedications prior to and during baseline data collection and were randomized 1:1 to SNM or SMT. Subjects had bothersome symptoms of overactive bladder (OAB) including urinary urge incontinence (?2 leaks/72 hr) and/or urgency-frequency (?8 voids/day). Subjects failed at least one anticholinergic medication, and had at least one medication not yet attempted. The primary objective was to compare OAB therapeutic success rate at 6 months betweenSNMandSMT.Results: Overall, 147 subjects were randomized (70 toSNMand 77 to SMT);93%were female and mean age was 58. The primary intent to treat analysis showed OAB therapeutic success was significantly greater in theSNMgroup (61%) than theSMTgroup (42%; P¼0.02). In the as treated analysis,OABtherapeutic success was76%forSNMand49%forSMT(P¼0.002). TheSNMgroup showed significant improvements in quality of life versus the SMT group (all P<0.001) and 86% of SNM subjects reported improved or greatly improved urinary symptom interference score at 6 months, compared to 44% for SMT subjects. The device-related adverse event rate was 30.5% and the medication-related adverse event rate was 27.3%. Conclusions: This study demonstrates superior objective and subjective success of SNM compared to SMT. SNM is shown to be a safe and effective treatment for OAB patients with mild to moderate symptoms.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schumm, K., & Lam, T. (2010). Types of urethral catheters for management of short-term voiding problems in hospitalized adults: a short version Cochrane Review. Sri Lanka Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 31(2), 110. https://doi.org/10.4038/sljog.v31i2.1756

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free