What is My Role in Changing the System? A New Model of Responsibility for Structural Injustice

65Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

What responsibility do individuals bear for structural injustice? Iris Marion Young has offered the most fully developed account to date, the Social Connections Model. She argues that we all bear responsibility because we each causally contribute to structural processes that produce injustice. My aim in this article is to motivate and defend an alternative account that improves on Young’s model by addressing five fundamental challenges faced by any such theory. The core idea of what I call the “Role-Ideal Model” is that we are each responsible for structural injustice through and in virtue of our social roles, i.e. our roles as parents, colleagues, employers, citizens, etc., because roles are the site where structure meets agency. In short, the Role-Ideal Model (1) explains how individual action contributes to structural change, (2) justifies demands for action from each particular agent, (3) specifies what kinds of acts should be undertaken, (4) moderates between demanding too much and too little of individual agents, and (5) provides an account of the critical responses appropriate for holding individuals accountable for structural injustice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zheng, R. (2018). What is My Role in Changing the System? A New Model of Responsibility for Structural Injustice. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 21(4), 869–885. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-018-9892-8

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free