Pretending not to see or hear, refusing to signify: The farce and tragedy of geocentric public affairs scholarship

6Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This article opens with an inventory of how popular culture passion plays are homologous to the stampeding disenfranchisement everywhere of working classes and the emasculation of professional codes of ethics under siege by neoliberal initiatives and gambits.The article then examines a recent example of contemporary,"deconstructive" scholarly analysis and inventory of presidential "Orwellian doublespeak." The preoccupation among contemporary critical scholarship with "discourse analysis" and language gambits is criticized for displacing interrogation of real-event anomalies, as with the porous account given by the 9/11 Commission for what happened that fateful day. The article concludes by explaining how critical scholarship consistently falls short of unmasking Master Signifiers. © 2010 SAGE Publications.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Witt, M. T. (2010). Pretending not to see or hear, refusing to signify: The farce and tragedy of geocentric public affairs scholarship. American Behavioral Scientist, 53(6), 921–939. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764209353281

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free