Assisted hatching - A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

65Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: To conduct a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on assisted hatching. Methods: One hundred sixty-five studies were retrieved from the literature, but only 13 of them fitted our selection criteria. The meta-analysis was conducted using the RevMan software with the Peto-modified Mantel-Haenszel method. Results: Assisted hatching increases the pregnancy [OR (±95% CI) = 2,51 (1.91-3.29)], implantation [OR (±95% CI) = 2.38 (1.87-3.03)], and ongoing pregnancy rates [OR (±95% CI) = 2.65 (1.85-3.79)] significantly in poor prognosis patients undergoing IVF or ICSI. For patients with repeated IVF failures, the OR (±95% CI) were 2.84 (1.99-4.06) for pregnancy, 2.53 (1.85-3.47) for implantation, and 3.51 (2.12-5.82) for ongoing pregnancy rates, in favor of assisted hatching. Conclusions: Assisted hatching increases the pregnancy, implantation, and ongoing pregnancy rates significantly in patients with a poor prognosis undergoing IVF or ICSI, particularly those with repeated failures.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sallam, H. N., Sadek, S. S., & Agameya, A. F. (2003, August 1). Assisted hatching - A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024865725713

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free