Latent profiles of challenge, hindrance, and threat appraisals on time pressure and job complexity: Antecedents and outcomes

N/ACitations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This research challenges the a priori classification of time pressure and job complexity as challenge stressors and seeks to illuminate the emergence of different appraisal configurations using a latent profile approach. The sample consisted of 629 employees (66.1% male). Employees who appraised time pressure and job complexity as challenges reported higher job satisfaction and work engagement and felt less emotionally exhausted and mentally stressed compared to those with dominant hindrance/threat appraisals. Employees who report to be more resilient and have autonomy are more likely to fall into a Dominant Challenge Appraisal profile. Those who face high emotional demands are more likely to be in a Dominant Hindrance/Threat Appraisal profile. This research offers a fresh perspective on why it is essential for employers to consider their teams’ perceptions and resources when introducing new tasks or deadlines. By providing employees with adequate resources, organizations can promote a more adaptive approach to work challenges. JEL Classification: L20, L29, L00

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kunzelmann, A., Rigotti, T., & Crane, M. F. (2025). Latent profiles of challenge, hindrance, and threat appraisals on time pressure and job complexity: Antecedents and outcomes. Australian Journal of Management, 50(2), 431–458. https://doi.org/10.1177/03128962231222825

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free