Bridging the AI implementation gap in otolaryngology: A clinical commentary

2Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is moving rapidly from research into specialty clinical care. Otolaryngology (ENT), deeply reliant on imaging, endoscopy, and complex multimodal diagnostics, is positioned to benefit substantially, but faces unique barriers to real-world AI adoption. While prior commentaries have highlighted general obstacles such as data diversity, workflow integration, and explainability, this manuscript examines how these challenges manifest specifically in ENT subspecialties. Focusing on cochlear implant (CI) mapping, vestibular diagnostics, and voice/speech rehabilitation, we detail the distinctive workflow, regulatory, and medico-legal issues of AI in ENT. We provide a roadmap for closing the implementation gap, emphasizing the need for subspecialty-driven validation, tailored reporting standards, and collaborative governance. Ultimately, the responsible integration of AI in otolaryngology can serve as a model for translating advanced technologies into procedural, multidisciplinary fields.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Burmeister, J. R., Dimock, E., Haupert, M., & Zazay, I. (2025, January 1). Bridging the AI implementation gap in otolaryngology: A clinical commentary. Digital Health. SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251396981

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free