O03. CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC OUTCOMES AFTER 3 YEARS OF SARILUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS

  • Genovese M
  • van Adelsberg J
  • van Hoogstraten H
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Sarilumab, an investigational human IL-6 receptor mAb, demonstrated statistically significant improvements in signs and symptoms of RA, physical function, and inhibition of radiographic progression in combination with MTX in the 1-year phase 3 MOBILITY study (NCT01061736). Objectives: This analysis examined 2-year clinical and radiographic outcomes and safety in patients completing the MOBILITY study who continued in the open-label, long-term extension (OLE) study EXTEND (NCT01146652) and were treated with sarilumab 200 mg q2w. Methods: Patients who participated in MOBILITY were initially randomized to placebo or sarilumab 150 or 200 mg subcutaneously for up to 1 year. Early rescue with open-label sarilumab 200 mg was allowed in case of insufficient response after wk 16. Following MOBILITY patients were eligible for enrollment in EXTEND, where all patients received active treatment (sarilumab 200 mg q2w after final dose selection) + MTX. Radiographs of patients who had a radiograph available at baseline and in the first and second year were centrally read by 2 readers independently. Linear extrapolation was performed if a patient had 2 postbaseline radiographs but was missing a radiograph at year 2. Analysis of clinical endpoints was based on all available data. Clinical endpoints were set to missing after early treatment discontinuation but not after rescue with open-label sarilumab. Statistical analysis was performed on the basis of patients' original randomized treatment assignment (placebo, or sarilumab 150 or 200 mg), regardless of whether the patient was rescued during the double-blind period (MOBILITY). Results: Of the 1197 randomized patients enrolled in MOBILITY, 901 patients participated in EXTEND (Table). At year 2, disease activity (DAS28-CRP and CDAI) reached the same level regardless of initial treatment. In addition, at year 2, percentages of patients achieving DAS28-CRP <2.6 were similar in the 3 groups, and similar trends were observed for CDAI remission (CDAI =5% in >=1 treatment group) were neutropenia (17.8%), increased ALT (11.6%), and upper respiratory tract infections (11.1%). Conclusions: Once active treatment with sarilumab 200 mg q2w was initiated after year 1, clinical response at year 2 was similar irrespective of prior treatment, and radiographic progression stabilized. Adverse events were consistent with the anticipated effects of IL-6 inhibition and the known safety profile of sarilumab. (Table Presented).

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Genovese, M. C., van Adelsberg, J., van Hoogstraten, H., Iglesias-Rodriguez, M., Mangan, E. K., Graham, N., & Spindler, A. (2017). O03. CLINICAL AND RADIOGRAPHIC OUTCOMES AFTER 3 YEARS OF SARILUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS. Rheumatology, 56(suppl_2). https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kex061.003

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free