Abbott ARCHITECT iPhenytoin assay versus similar assays for measuring free phenytoin concentrations

1Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: To measure free phenytoin (FP) concentrations in filtered specimens using the Abbott ARCHITECT iPhenytoin assay and to compare results from this method with results from the Abbott TDx/FLx assays. Methods: We verified accuracy, analytic measurement range, and precision for FP measurements. For correlation and therapeutic interval studies, we used filtered calibrators, controls, proficiency-testing materials, and surplus clinical samples. After implementation, we determined proficiency testing results. Results: The analytic measurement range was 2.0 to 25.0 μmol/L. Quality control materials (6.1, 12.6, and 20.1 μmol/L) provided mean (SD) recoveries of 96.1 (5.0%), 99.2 (5.0%), and 99.3 (5.7%), respectively, and coefficients of variation of 5.2%, 5.0%, and 5.8%, respectively. Clinical specimens produced mean (SD) FP recovery levels of 103.7 (10.6%) (bias, 0.1 [0.3] μmol/L). Altering the FP therapeutic range (4.0-8.0 μmol/L) was unnecessary. Proficiency testing yielded consistently acceptable results. Conclusion: Our accuracy, precision, and correlation results were similar for the TDx/FLx and ARCHITECT assays, which demonstrates that the ARCHITECT iPhenytoin assay is acceptable for clinical FP measurements.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tacker, D. H., Robinson, R., & Perrotta, P. L. (2014). Abbott ARCHITECT iPhenytoin assay versus similar assays for measuring free phenytoin concentrations. Lab Medicine, 45(2), 176–181. https://doi.org/10.1309/LM28B9DSRJCBCWWJ

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free