Comparison of MB/BacT and BACTEC 460 TB systems for recovery of mycobacteria in a routine diagnostic laboratory

22Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

MB/BacT, BACTEC 460 TB, and Lowenstein-Jensen (LJ) medium were evaluated in parallel for recovery of mycobacteria from 3,700 continuous clinical specimens in a routine laboratory. Mycobacteria were identified from 123 (3.3%) specimens. The recovery rates for all mycobacteria by the different systems were 91.0, 73.0, and 53.6% for BACTEC 460 TB, MB/BacT, and LJ medium, respectively. The recovery rates for Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex were 97.1, 80.2, and 67.6%, respectively. The lack of sensitivity of the MB/BacT system was more pronounced with smear-negative specimens and resulted in a failure to detect three patients with infectious tuberculosis.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Roggenkamp, A., Hornef, M. W., Masch, A., Aigner, B., Autenrieth, I. B., & Heesemann, J. (1999). Comparison of MB/BacT and BACTEC 460 TB systems for recovery of mycobacteria in a routine diagnostic laboratory. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 37(11), 3711–3712. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.37.11.3711-3712.1999

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free