Effect of prepackage and postpackage pasteurization on postprocess elimination of Listeria monocytogenes on deli turkey products

35Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Surface pasteurization for inactivation of Listeria monocytogenes was evaluated for radiant heat prepackage pasteurization, submersed water postpackage pasteurization, and combinations of the two techniques on various types of ready-to-eat deli turkey products obtained from at least four different manufacturers. Products were inoculated either by in-package liquid inoculum or surface sponge-contact with approximately 109 CFU of L. monocytogenes. Additional testing of radiant heat pasteurization was performed with low-level inoculation of product undersides with approximately 100 CFU of L. monocytogenes followed by enrichment recovery after pasteurization. Prepackage pasteurization provided 2.0 to 2.8 log reductions when processed for 60 s and 2.8 to 3.8 log reductions when processed for 75 s. An improved radiant oven provided 3.53 (60 s) and 4.76 (75 s) log reductions of L. monocytogenes. No positive samples were detected after enrichment when 40 samples of deli turkey (4 to 4.5 kg) undersides were inoculated at low levels and processed for 75 s. Submersed water postpackage pasteurization provided 1.95 to 3.0 log reductions when processed for 2, 3, 4, or 5 min, and combinations of the two processes gave 3.0 to 4.0 log inactivation of L. monocytogenes using either 60 + 60s or 60 + 90s for the prepackage and postpackage pasteurization processes, respectively. These processes, either individually or in combination, can provide postprocess elimination of bacteria for the manufacture of safe ready-to-eat deli meats.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Muriana, P., Gande, N., Robertson, W., Jordan, B., & Mitra, S. (2004). Effect of prepackage and postpackage pasteurization on postprocess elimination of Listeria monocytogenes on deli turkey products. Journal of Food Protection, 67(11), 2472–2479. https://doi.org/10.4315/0362-028X-67.11.2472

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free