Don’t Accept All and Continue: Exploring Nudges for More Deliberate Interaction with Tracking Consent Notices

9Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Legal frameworks rely on users to make an informed decision about data collection, e.g., by accepting or declining the use of tracking technologies. In practice, however, users hardly interact with tracking consent notices on a deliberate website per website level, but usually accept or decline optional tracking technologies altogether in a habituated behavior. We explored the potential of three different nudge types (color highlighting, social cue, timer) and default settings to interrupt this auto-response in an experimental between-subject design with 167 participants. We did not find statistically significant differences regarding the buttons clicked. Our results showed that opt-in default settings significantly decrease tracking technology use acceptance rates. These results are a first step towards understanding the effects of different nudging concepts on users’ interaction with tracking consent notices.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gerber, N., Stöver, A., Peschke, J., & Zimmermann, V. (2023). Don’t Accept All and Continue: Exploring Nudges for More Deliberate Interaction with Tracking Consent Notices. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 31(1). https://doi.org/10.1145/3617363

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free