U.S. CO2 mitigation in a global context: Welfare, trade and land use

10Citations
Citations of this article
23Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

We describe carbon dioxide mitigation scenarios specified by the Energy Modeling Forum study (EMF-24) "U.S. Technology Transitions under Alternative Climate Policies," using a global computable general equilibrium model that simulates world energy and agricultural systems through 2050. One set of scenarios covers variation across five major technology groups: end-use technology, carbon dioxide capture and storage, nuclear electricity generation, wind and solar power, and bioenergy. Other scenarios cover variation across policies. Policies such as a renewable portfolio standard for electricity generation or a clean electricity standard have the potential for significant emissions reductions, but at a greater cost than a cap-and-trade scenario with the same reduction in emissions. Cap-andtrade scenarios resulted in carbon dioxide leakage rates of 11 to 20 percent depending on the stringency of the targets. Oil-exporting regions without a mitigation policy may still have significant welfare losses when other world regions reduce emissions. © 2014 by the IAEE.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sands, R. D., Schumacher, K., & Förster, H. (2014). U.S. CO2 mitigation in a global context: Welfare, trade and land use. Energy Journal, 35(SPEC. ISSUE 1), 181–197. https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.35.SI1.10

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free