Clinical evaluation of the Filmarray blood culture identification panel in identification of bacteria and yeasts from positive blood culture bottles

236Citations
Citations of this article
192Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The FilmArray platform (FA; BioFire, Salt Lake City, UT) is a closed diagnostic system allowing high-order multiplex PCR analysis with automated readout of results directly from positive blood cultures in 1 h. In the present study, we evaluated the clinical performance of the FilmArray blood culture identification (BCID) panel, which includes 19 bacteria, five yeasts, and three antibiotic resistance genes. In total, 206 blood culture bottles were included in the study. The FilmArray could identify microorganisms in 153/167 (91.6%) samples with monomicrobial growth. Thirteen of the 167 (7.8%) microorganisms were not covered by the FilmArray BCID panel. In 6/167 (3.6%) samples, the FilmArray detected an additional microorganism compared to blood culture. When polymicrobial growth was analyzed, the FilmArray could detect all target microorganisms in 17/24 (71%) samples. Twelve blood culture bottles that yielded a positive signal but showed no growth were also negative by FilmArray. In 3/206 (1.5%) bottles, the FilmArray results were invalid. The results of the FilmArray were reproducible, as demonstrated by the testing and retesting of five bottles in the same day and a longitudinal follow-up of five other blood cultures up to 4 weeks. The present study shows that the FilmArray is a rapid identification method with high performance in direct identification of bacteria and yeasts from positive blood culture bottles. Copyright © 2013, American Society for Microbiology. All Rights Reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Altun, O., Almuhayawi, M., Ullberg, M., & Ozenci, V. (2013). Clinical evaluation of the Filmarray blood culture identification panel in identification of bacteria and yeasts from positive blood culture bottles. Journal of Clinical Microbiology, 51(12), 4130–4136. https://doi.org/10.1128/JCM.01835-13

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free