Abstract
A recent review of research in electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) for depression, for which I was the first author, found that only 11 placebo-controlled studies have even been conducted, all pre-1986. Our review concluded that they were so flawed that the meta-analyses that relied on them were wrong to conclude that ECT is effective. This commentary responds to a critique of the review by Ian Anderson. Some valuable comments are acknowledged and several errors or misunderstandings rectified.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Read, J. (2021). On this month’s Round the Corner: I welcome the argument about ECT. BJPsych Advances, 27(5), 292–294. https://doi.org/10.1192/bja.2021.40
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.