Histological variants of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a survival analysis

23Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Purpose: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) can be classified into distinct histological subtypes based on the WHO nomenclature. The aim of this study was to compare the prognosis of conventional PDAC (cPDAC) against the other histological variants at the population level. Methods: The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database was used to identify patients with microscopically confirmed PDAC. These patients were divided into 9 histological subgroups. Overall survival was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression models stratified by tumor histology. Results: A total of 159,548 patients with PDAC were identified, of whom 95.9% had cPDAC, followed by colloid carcinoma (CC) (2.6%), adenosquamous carcinoma (ASqC) (0.8%), signet ring cell carcinoma (SRCC) (0.5%), undifferentiated carcinoma (UC) (0.1%), undifferentiated carcinoma with osteoclast-like giant cells (UCOGC) (0.1%), hepatoid carcinoma (HC) (0.01%), medullary carcinoma of the pancreas (MCP) (0.006%) and pancreatic undifferentiated carcinoma with rhabdoid phenotype (PUCR) (0.003%). Kaplan-Meier curves showed that PUCR had the worst prognosis (median survival: 2 months; 5-year survival: 0%), while MCP had the best prognosis (median survival: 41 months; 5-year survival: 33.3%). In a multivariable Cox model, several histological subtypes (i.e. CC, ASqC, SRCC, UCOGC) were identified as independent predictors of overall survival when compared to cPDAC. Conclusion: PDAC is a heterogenous disease and accurate identification of variant histology is important for risk stratification, as these variants may have different biological behavior.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bengtsson, A., Andersson, R., & Ansari, D. (2024). Histological variants of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a survival analysis. Langenbeck’s Archives of Surgery, 409(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-024-03506-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free