Defining poor ovarian response during IVF cycles, in women aged <40 years, and its relationship with treatment outcome

95Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Poor ovarian response limits IVF success but assessing interventions is difficult because of the wide variation in definition. This study attempts to derive objective definitions of poor response. Methods: A retrospective study of a consecutive series of 1190 patients aged <40 years undergoing their first IVF/ICSI cycle was undertaken. Factors adversely affecting implantation, including advanced female age, were excluded. Clinical outcome in cycles reaching oocyte retrieval (n = 1036) were evaluated with respect to gonadotrophin dose used and oocyte number. Cancelled cycles (n = 154) were analysed in relation to the stimulation dose at cancellation and outcome of their subsequent cycle. Results: Cycle cancellation for patients on ≥300 IU FSH/day compared to those on a lower dose was associated with a significantly worse outcome in the subsequent cycle. If <3000 IU FSH/cycle were administered, clinical pregnancy rates remained favourable if <4 eggs were recovered (29 versus 33% for ≥5 eggs). By contrast, if ≥3000 IU FSH was required, the pregnancy rate was 25% if ≥5 eggs were recovered but declined to 7% if <4 were obtained. Conclusions: Definitions of poor response should include the degree of ovarian stimulation used. A low oocyte number is only detrimental if the cumulative dose is >3000 IU FSH. Cancellation at ≥300 IU FSH/day is associated with a significantly worse prognosis and could define poor response. © European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology 2004; all rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kailasam, C., Keay, S. D., Wilson, P., Ford, W. C. L., & Jenkins, J. M. (2004). Defining poor ovarian response during IVF cycles, in women aged <40 years, and its relationship with treatment outcome. Human Reproduction, 19(7), 1544–1547. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deh273

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free