Effect of Source on Perceptions of Pulse Nutrition Information

Abstract

Objectives Despite the availability of empirically supported dietary guidelines, Americans largely have nutritionally inadequate diets; few eat enough pulses, which meet dietary requirements for both vegetables and protein (Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2020–2025, 2020). The purpose of the present study was to determine how information source (control, USDA, hospital, or social media) impacts perceptions of diet information. We hypothesized that non-government diet information sources (hospital, social media) would be perceived as more trustworthy and more likely to be followed. Methods Participants (N = 537) completed a survey in which they viewed a flyer containing information about consuming pulses. There were 4 conditions in which the purported source of the information was manipulated: control (no source), USDA, a fictitious hospital, and a fictitious social media user. Participants answered questions regarding their perceptions of the flyer’s accuracy, how trustworthy and reliable the source was, their interest in learning more from the source, and their likelihood of following the flyer advice. Participants also indicated their attitudes, perceived control, and perceived norms regarding eating pulses to assess the primary components of the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB; Ajzen, 2013). Finally, participants rated their top 3 most trusted sources for health information from a list of 27 sources. Results Results of ANOVA indicated that the USDA and hospital sources were rated as more accurate, trustworthy, reliable, and more desirable to learn more from relative to the control and social media conditions (ps