Automatic detection and resolution of measurement-unit conflicts in aggregated data

3Citations
Citations of this article
25Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Measurement-unit conflicts are a perennial problem in integrative research domains such as clinical meta-analysis. As multi-national collaborations grow, as new measurement instruments appear, and as Linked Open Data infrastructures become increasingly pervasive, the number of such conflicts will similarly increase. Methods. We propose a generic approach to the problem of (a) encoding measurement units in datasets in a machine-readable manner, (b) detecting when a dataset contained mixtures of measurement units, and (c) automatically converting any conflicting units into a desired unit, as defined for a given study. Results: We utilized existing ontologies and standards for scientific data representation, measurement unit definition, and data manipulation to build a simple and flexible Semantic Web Service-based approach to measurement-unit harmonization. A cardiovascular patient cohort in which clinical measurements were recorded in a number of different units (e.g., mmHg and cmHg for blood pressure) was automatically classified into a number of clinical phenotypes, semantically defined using different measurement units. Conclusions: We demonstrate that through a combination of semantic standards and frameworks, unit integration problems can be automatically detected and resolved. © 2014 Samadian et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Samadian, S., McManus, B., & Wilkinson, M. (2014). Automatic detection and resolution of measurement-unit conflicts in aggregated data. BMC Medical Genomics, 7(SUPPL.1). https://doi.org/10.1186/1755-8794-7-S1-S12

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free