Human rights and psychiatric power in dispute. Towards a radicalization of democracy?

  • Pérez Pérez B
  • Pujal i Llombart M
  • Mora E
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
3Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Abstract This article analyzes the type of power that is disputed in contemporary debates on human rights, mental health and equal recognition before the law (Art. 12 of the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: CRPD), where the most burning issue is the abolition of involuntary treatment and commitment. To do so, we intersect Foucault's and Agamben's perspectives on sovereign power and biopowers. We analyze the emergence of the psychiatric device as institution; legal medicine; biological determinism, and; line of thanatopolitical escape, the point of emergence of Nazi extermination. We connect this analysis with the emergence of human rights and UN regulations on "disability/mental illness" up to the CRPD. Among other things, we conclude that the authoritative interpretation of Art. 12 abolishes a state of exception to human rights, which is constitutive of modern democracy and of the emergence and deployment of the psychiatric device, whose competencies of sovereign power are in dispute.Resumen Este artículo analiza el tipo de poder que está en disputa en los debates contemporáneos sobre los derechos humanos, la salud mental y el igual reconocimiento ante la ley (Art. 12 de la Convención sobre los Derechos de las Personas con Discapacidad: CDPD), cuyo punto más candente es la abolición del tratamiento e internamiento involuntarios. Para ello, entrecruzamos las perspectivas de Foucault y Agamben sobre el poder soberano y los biopoderes. Analizamos la emergencia del dispositivo psiquiátrico como institución; medicina legal; determinismo biológico y; líniea de fuga tanatopolítica, punto de surgimiento del exterminio Nazi. Entroncamos este análisis con la emergencia de los derechos humanos y de las normativas de la ONU sobre “discapacidad/enfermedad mental” hasta la CDPD. Entre otros, concluimos que la interpretación autorizada del Art. 12 deroga un estado de excepción a los derechos humanos, que es constitutivo de la democracia moderna y de la emergencia y despliegue del dispositivo psiquiátrico, cuyas competencias de poder soberano están en disputa.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pérez Pérez, B., Pujal i Llombart, M., & Mora, E. (2024). Human rights and psychiatric power in dispute. Towards a radicalization of democracy? Revista Direito e Práxis, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1590/2179-8966/2022/65459i

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free