The dog that did not bark: A defense of return predictability

621Citations
Citations of this article
610Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

If returns are not predictable, dividend growth must be predictable, to generate the observed variation in divided yields. I find that the absence of dividend growth predictability gives stronger evidence than does the presence of return predictability. Long-horizon return forecasts give the same strong evidence. These tests exploit the negative correlation of return forecasts with dividend-yield autocorrelation across samples, together with sensible upper bounds on dividend-yield autocorrelation, to deliver more powerful statistics. I reconcile my findings with the literature that finds poor power in long-horizon return forecasts, and with the literature that notes the poor out-of-sample R2 of return-forecasting regressions. © The Author 2007. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Society for Financial Studies. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Cochrane, J. H. (2008). The dog that did not bark: A defense of return predictability. Review of Financial Studies, 21(4), 1533–1575. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhm046

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free