Plant photosynthesis in basil (C3) and maize (C4) under different light conditions as basis of an AI-based model for PAM fluorescence/gas-exchange correlation

4Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Photosynthetic activity can be monitored using pulse amplitude modulated (PAM) fluorescence or gas exchange. While PAM provides insight into the light-dependent reactions, gas exchange reflects CO2 fixation and water balance. Accurate, non-invasive prediction of photosynthetic performance under varying conditions is highly relevant for phenotyping and stress diagnostics. Despite their physiological link, data from both methods do not always correlate. To systematically investigate this relationship, photosynthetic parameters were measured in maize (Zea mays, C4) and basil (Ocimum basilicum, C3) under different photon densities and spectral compositions. Maize showed the highest CO2 assimilation rate of 30.99 ± 1.54 µmol CO2/(m²s) under 2000 PAR green light (527 nm), while basil reached 10.56 ± 0.92 µmol CO2/(m²s) under red light (630 nm). PAM-derived electron transport rates (ETR) increased with light intensity in a pattern similar to CO2 assimilation, but did not reliably reflect its absolute values under all conditions. To improve prediction accuracy, we applied a machine learning model. XGBoost, a gradient-boosted decision tree algorithm, efficiently captures nonlinear interactions between physiological and environmental parameters. It achieved superior performance (R² = 0.847; MSE = 5.24) compared to the Random Forest model. Our model enables accurate photosynthesis prediction from PAM data across light intensities and spectral conditions in both C3 and C4 plants.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pappert, I., Klir, S., Jokic, L., Ühlein, C., Tran Quoc, K., & Kaldenhoff, R. (2025). Plant photosynthesis in basil (C3) and maize (C4) under different light conditions as basis of an AI-based model for PAM fluorescence/gas-exchange correlation. Frontiers in Plant Science, 16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2025.1590884

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free