ETHICS in DESIGN EDUCATION, but DIFFERENT; PRACTICING the PRACTICAL TURN

4Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Design education has looked for different approaches to teaching ethics and ethical behaviour. In this paper I want to add an approach that is coming from the collaboration between design research and philosophy of technology. Philosophy of Technology has produced a substantive number of theories and reflections about the impacts of technology and innovations on our daily lives and social behaviours. To make the reflections from philosophy of technology more tangible for design engineering students we experimented over the years with different tools and practical approaches in order to integrate these perspectives directly in the design process. In analogy with the empirical turn before, we named this closer integration with design ‘the Practical Turn in Philosophy of Technology’. My argument now is that by using these insights, one can cultivate ethical reflection with design engineering students by directly informing their design process in what I call ‘practicing the practical turn’. In this paper I will show this approach alongside the results of a one week workshop with a group of students from the University of Antwerp in the context of responsible design for public space.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Eggink, W. (2021). ETHICS in DESIGN EDUCATION, but DIFFERENT; PRACTICING the PRACTICAL TURN. In Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Engineering and Product Design Education, E and PDE 2021. The Design Society. https://doi.org/10.35199/epde.2021.18

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free