Shared decision-making in patient–doctor consultations – How does it relate to other patient-centred aspects and satisfaction?

4Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: This study was designed to investigate how patient-reported shared decision-making relates to other aspects of patient centredness and satisfaction. Methods: Questionnaire study with patients. Consecutive patients in primary care responding post visit. Associations are presented as proportions, positive predictive values, with 95% confidence intervals. Results: 223 patient questionnaires were included. 62% (95% Confidence interval (CI): 55–69) of the patients indicated the highest possible rating of being involved in the decisions about their ongoing care (self-reported SDM). Self-reported SDM had a positive predictive value (PPV) of between 85% (CI: 77–90) and 95% (CI: 90–98) for five other patient-centred aspects and satisfaction. Conclusion: The results suggest that shared decision making is the patient-centred aspect hardest to achieve and that a patient-centred process leading up to the decision-making increases the chance of the patient being involved in the decision-making.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bodegård, H., Helgesson, G., Olsson, D., Juth, N., & Lynøe, N. (2022). Shared decision-making in patient–doctor consultations – How does it relate to other patient-centred aspects and satisfaction? Clinical Ethics, 17(2), 152–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/14777509211015897

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free